bitterlemons-international.org
Middle East Roundtable /
Edition 18/2008
An Israeli View:
What the Jews achieved and what the Arabs achieved
by Yisrael Harel
A heavy moral cloud hung over Israel's
sixtieth Independence Day celebrations: a prime minister interrogated on the
holiday eve on suspicion of taking bribes; a former president who will soon
stand trial for severe moral crimes; a minister of finance already indicted
for theft and fraud and a member of Knesset convicted just before the
holiday for taking bribes. Yet no serious person taking stock of the
situation with historical perspective and objectivity would say that because
of high-level corruption the Jewish state is corrupt and has failed.
Quite the contrary: the moral decline of some circles in Israeli society,
its academic institutions, the wealthy, the media and government is
overshadowed by a beautiful, patriotic, just, courageous and industrious
Israel--an Israel that, from its inception, was never allowed to lay down
her sword yet still succeeded, without natural resources and without a
moment of grace from its enemies, to build one of the few economies that has
not been significantly hurt by a global economic crisis that has even
affected giants like the United States and Europe. Israeli universities,
despite their ceaseless complaints regarding lack of resources, hold a very
respectful position internationally. In the natural sciences, the number of
learned articles written in Israel and published in scientific journals is
higher, per capita, than science giants like England and Germany, and the
percentage of Israelis studying for a BA is the highest in the world.
According to the image they themselves like to project, the Palestinians are
"the Jews of the Arab world", i.e., they are better educated and more
industrious than their Arab brothers. Perhaps. Yet as far as competition
with Israel over levels of education is concerned--after all, this is the
only standard by which they can compete with Israel--they have wasted 60
years during which they enjoyed a certain advantage over Israelis: they
received huge financial aid from the United Nations and many nations of the
world and their children did not bear the burdens born by Israeli children,
such as three years of military service, during which they could apply
themselves to education.
Yet they did not do so sufficiently, for the same reason that they never
eliminated the refugee camps: they have turned the status of victim, their
own self-pity and the absolute desire for revenge against the Jews into,
first, a political weapon and, over time, a way of life. Yet in a world of
globalization and super-technology these weapons, while here and there they
might disturb the world's conscience, have not brought the Palestinians
closer to any of their goals. On the contrary, with every passing day the
gap grows between Israel, as it presses ahead toward ever more achievements,
and the Palestinians, who fortify themselves with ever more
self-righteousness and backwardness. The goal of establishing a Palestinian
state on the ruins of Israel (a position held by the majority of
Palestinians) or on the 1967 lines (a position still adhered to by a
minority composed of pragmatists who recognize that suicide terrorism will
never defeat Israel) is receding.
The broader Arab world as well, including the oil-rich countries, finds
itself lagging behind Israel. The hundreds of billions of dollars flowing
into its treasuries are not properly exploited. Israel's per capita income,
even without oil, is around $20,000, compared to less than $3,000 in the
Palestinian Authority, Egypt or Syria. True, high income does not always
correspond with national resilience or determination--indeed, in these
realms Israel has regressed significantly in recent decades--yet the crisis,
however serious, has not caused weakness at the national level. In this
respect we are witness to vitality in all walks of Israeli life, including a
cultural and literary flowering that reflects impressive capacities on the
part of Israeli society.
In the forty-sixth year of Israeli independence, 1994, the Palestinians were
given a one-time opportunity to prove they are the "Jews of the Arab world".
The Oslo agreement granted them de facto independence and control over
sufficient territory to lay an administrative, judicial and educational
infrastructure and prepare all the other components that characterize a
state--just as the Jews did under the British mandate. No one got in their
way; indeed, the entire world, Israel included, encouraged them to move
toward creating these infrastructures. But Yasser Arafat and his followers (from
the moment that Israel, in one of its sorriest acts, allowed him along with
more than 40,000 armed men to enter the territory of the Palestinian
Authority) chose instead to wage a war of terror and attrition.
True, the attrition worked to some extent on Israel. Yet the Israelis
rallied more economic, human and professional resources than the
Palestinians and won this war too. And with the Palestinians worn down--even
the limited and insufficient war Israel is waging, using a small portion of
its technological and human capabilities, has dealt Hamas sufficient blows
to bring it to sue for a ceasefire--Israel can allow itself to carry on
business (almost) as usual.
In recent years, and particularly since their "vision documents" were
published in Israel and the world, another important actor has joined the
fray: the Israeli Palestinians. Their actions, declarations and publications,
which negate Israel's existence as the national home of the Jewish people,
generate growing suspicion among the Jewish public regarding Palestinian
intentions. Not only do these Palestinians reject the existence of the state
in which they are citizens but they also pressure the PA, for example on the
eve of the Annapolis conference, not to dare recognize Israel as the state
of the Jewish people.
Here, then, is the balance we have drawn: while the Arabs invest their
primary resources in an ongoing conflict with Israel the latter, in an
effort unprecedented in the world, succeeds in mustering not only the heavy
resources required for its defense, but also a large portion of its citizens'
capabilities toward creativity and development in every field. Thus after 60
years Israel, despite frequent crises and its own societal ills, is on the
path to progress, development, overcoming the many obstacles and failures in
its way and enlarging the gaps that separate it from those who deny its
right to exist. Throughout most of the Arab world, on the other hand, and
particularly in the Palestinian camp, things are moving in the opposite
direction: they are regressing.- Published 12/5/2008 © bitterlemons.org
Yisrael Harel heads the Institute for Zionist Strategy in Jerusalem and
writes a weekly political column in Haaretz. He is former head of the Yesha
Council (Council of Jewish Settlements in Judea, Samaria and the Gaza
District) and former editor of its monthly Nekuda.
Bitterlemons-international.org is an internet
forum for an array of world perspectives on the Middle East and its
specific concerns. It aspires to engender greater understanding about
the Middle East region and open a new common space for world thinkers
and political leaders to present their viewpoints and initiatives on the
region. Editors Ghassan Khatib and Yossi Alpher can be reached at
ghassan@bitterlemons-international.org
and
yossi@bitterlemons-international.org, respectively.
hagalil.com 13-05-2008 |